Which of the following methods is commonly used to evaluate the quality of biotechnology research?

Peer review is a critical and widely accepted method for evaluating the quality of biotechnology research. This process involves the assessment of research findings by independent experts in the same field before the work is published in scientific journals. The peer review system ensures that the research is scrutinized for its methodology, validity, significance, and overall contribution to the scientific community. This rigorous evaluation helps maintain the integrity and credibility of scientific literature, fostering trust in the results presented.

Field trials, while important for testing the practical applications of biotechnological innovations in real-world settings, are not primarily focused on the evaluation of research quality itself. Instead, they assess the effectiveness and safety of a biotechnology product. Market analysis provides insights into potential commercial viability but does not address the scientific merit of the research. Brand auditing relates to assessing the perception and market position of a brand, which is not relevant to evaluating the quality of research.

Thus, peer review stands out as the primary method used to ensure that research in biotechnology is reliable, valid, and contributes meaningfully to the field.